Companies Lockheed Martin

Lockheed Martin

Waverley, New South Wales, AUS

108,588 Total Employees

Year Founded: 1912

View Website

Similar Companies Hiring

CSC

Fintech • Legal Tech • Software • Financial Services • Cybersecurity • Data Privacy

40 Offices

8500 Employees

Verkada Inc

Cloud • Hardware • Security • Software

15 Offices

2000 Employees

Rubrik

Artificial Intelligence • Big Data • Cloud • Information Technology • Software • Cybersecurity • Data Privacy

24 Offices

3000 Employees

Lockheed Martin Leadership & Management

Updated on January 08, 2026

This page was generated by Built In using publicly available information and AI-based analysis of common questions about the company. It has not been reviewed or approved by the company.

How are the managers & leadership at Lockheed Martin?

Strengths in clear strategic direction, structured leader development, and disciplined execution are accompanied by challenges in agility, communication consistency, and perceived fairness in advancement. Together, these dynamics suggest an environment optimized for mission-driven, process-oriented delivery where local leadership quality and program context strongly shape day-to-day experience.

Positive Themes About Lockheed Martin

Strategic Vision & Planning: Feedback suggests leadership articulates a coherent direction centered on 21st Century Security and an enterprise digital transformation (1LMX). This shared compass aligns priorities around interoperability, speed, and a model-based digital thread.
Development & Mentorship: Feedback suggests the company invests in formal Leadership Development Programs, rotational assignments, and conferences that groom future leaders and emphasize consistent practices. Participants report rapid learning and broad exposure through these structured paths.
Strong Execution: Program-management rigor and established procedures make expectations and workflows clear in a high-consequence, regulated environment. Managers frequently bring deep domain knowledge and a mission/safety focus from engineering and program roles.

Considerations About Lockheed Martin

Strategic Inflexibility: Heavy processes, layers of approval, and a slower change cadence are cited as persistent friction points across some groups. These dynamics can impede agility and frustrate talent seeking faster decision cycles.
Lack of Transparency & Communication: Feedback points to uneven coaching, growth support, and cross-team communication compared with other strengths. Senior leadership messaging is clear externally, yet day-to-day goal clarity and communication quality are described as variable by program and site.
Biased or Inconsistent Leadership: Accounts describe favoritism, 'buddy systems,' and cliques influencing promotions and recognition in certain areas. This contributes to perceptions of slow advancement and inconsistent people-leadership quality despite strong technical management.

NEW

What does AI tell candidates about your employer brand?

Get your free AI reputation report today.

See AI Report

The insights on this page are generated by submitting structured prompts to some of the most popular large language models (“LLMs”) and summarizing recurring themes from the responses. Because the insights are generated using AI, they may contain errors. The insights do not necessarily reflect internal data, employee interviews, or verified company information. They may be influenced by incomplete, outdated, or inaccurate data, and may vary across LLM providers. These insights are intended for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as a factual or definitive assessment of a company's reputation. Built In makes no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of this information, and disclaims any liability for any actions taken based on this information. If you are a representative of this company, and would like this page to be removed, you may contact us via this form.

Is This Your Company? Claim Profile