PAR Technology

2,000 Total Employees
Year Founded: 1968

Similar Companies Hiring

eCommerce • Information Technology • Marketing Tech • Software
7 Offices
450 Employees
Fintech • Legal Tech • Software • Financial Services • Cybersecurity • Data Privacy
40 Offices
8500 Employees
Artificial Intelligence • Big Data • Healthtech • Machine Learning • Software • Database • Analytics
37 Offices
2407 Employees

PAR Technology Leadership & Management

Updated on February 06, 2026

This page was generated by Built In using publicly available information and AI-based analysis of common questions about the company. It has not been reviewed or approved by the company.

How are the managers & leadership at PAR Technology?

Strengths in strategic vision, communication, and execution are accompanied by challenges in managerial consistency, employee support, and cultural health at the team level. Together, these dynamics suggest clear top-down direction with uneven day-to-day management quality, making employee experience highly dependent on specific leaders and units.
Positive Themes About PAR Technology
  • Strategic Vision & Planning: Leadership consistently articulates a unified, SaaS-first platform strategy (e.g., “Better Together”) with multi-product integration, international expansion, and targeted acquisitions. Rebranding, portfolio focus, and enterprise wins reinforce a coherent long-term direction.
  • Open & Transparent Communication: Leadership communicates direction through CEO messages, earnings calls, and investor materials, tying values like ownership and urgency to stated priorities. Messaging across conferences and product launches aligns operational updates with the strategic roadmap.
  • Strong Execution: Capital raises, acquisitions/divestiture actions, and multiproduct deal traction indicate follow-through on the platform strategy. ARR expansion, bookings momentum, and operating discipline signal progress despite rollout complexity.
Considerations About PAR Technology
  • Biased or Inconsistent Leadership: Upper and domestic management are described as inconsistent and prone to micromanagement, with “old thinking” that conflicts with company goals. These patterns contribute to uneven decision-making quality across teams.
  • Neglect of Employee Support: Support for employees is described as limited, with growth paths constrained and workloads increased by benefit cuts and rising demands. Broken promises and insufficient guidance further undermine confidence in local management.
  • Toxic or Disempowering Culture: Workplace climate is depicted as toxic in places, with favoritism, poor work-life balance, and high turnover. Instances of staff being lied to and feeling intimidated point to a disempowering environment in pockets of the organization.
NEW
What does AI tell candidates about your employer brand?
Get your free AI reputation report today.
See AI Report
AI Report
AI Report

The insights on this page are generated by submitting structured prompts to some of the most popular large language models (“LLMs”) and summarizing recurring themes from the responses. Because the insights are generated using AI, they may contain errors. The insights do not necessarily reflect internal data, employee interviews, or verified company information. They may be influenced by incomplete, outdated, or inaccurate data, and may vary across LLM providers. These insights are intended for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as a factual or definitive assessment of a company's reputation. Built In makes no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of this information, and disclaims any liability for any actions taken based on this information. If you are a representative of this company, and would like this page to be removed, you may contact us via this form.
Is This Your Company? Claim Profile